2010 Supreme(J&K) 196
MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Talib Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.R. Qureshi
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Mughal
Advocate For Respondent: Neeru Goswami
1. It is contended that vide order dated 22nd of June 1994, Government framed and approved a Scheme for operation and maintenance of Water Supply Scheme in rural areas. In terms of the said Scheme, candidates whose names would be approved by the Village Level Committees were to be engaged as daily wagers. Accordingly, Superintending Engineer-respondent no.5 submitted a list of candidates for engagement on daily wage basis. Deputy Commissioner-respondent no.4 in turn recommended the case of the petitioners along with other candidates for engagement on daily wage basis. It is further contended that respondent no.5 vide communication dated 29th of April 1995 requested the Executive Engineer, PHE Division, Doda, to submit a list of all completed water supply schemes, which were without any operational staff and required to be made operational, with a further request about the requirement of the staff. Accordingly, respondent no.3 recommended the case of the petitioners, but department-respondent has not considered their case for engagement on daily wage basis. Further, it is contended that some other persons were engaged, who on completion of seven years service have been regularized.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document