SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(J&K) 295

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Ghulam Mohammad Ganai & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
J&K Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B. S. Bali, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. T. H. Khawaja, Advocate for respondents.

1. This Civil 1st Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2001 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Srinagar, whereby suit for recovery, titled as J&K Bank Vs. Ghulam Mohd. Ganai & others, came to be decreed in favour of plaintiff-respondent bank and against the defendants-appellants, on the grounds taken in the memo of appeal (hereinafter, for short, impugned judgment).

Brief Facts

2. Defendant-appellant No. 1 approached the plaintiff-respondent bank on 09.10.1975 for grant of loan facility for purchase of Tata Diesel Vehicle and loan facility to the extent of Rs. 95, 000/ - was sanctioned in his favour. He availed the facility after executing the documents viz, DP Note dated 09.10.1975 for Rs. 95, 000/-, Trust Receipt, Deed of Hypothecation and Irrevocable Power of Attorney. Defendants-appellants 2 & 3 executed the Deed of Guarantee and undertook to indemnify the plaintiff-respondent bank. It is also averred in the plaint that defendant-appellant no. 1 executed DP Note dated 09.10.1981 for Rs. 77, 996, 77 in favour of plaintiff-respondent bank and also executed DP Note dated 30.09.1987 for an amount of Rs. 1, 25, 895. 67. The said DP notes were executed to sav





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top