MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Brij Lal – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Dass Gupta – Respondent
2. Petitioner (defendant) has filed an application for setting aside ex-parte proceedings and for extension of time for filing written statement, which has been dismissed vide order dated 21.05.2012. It has been observed that as against order dated 11.01.2012, remedy available is to file revision petition.
3. Since the revisional powers have been curtailed vis-`-vis such like orders in view of the proviso to Section 115 of CPC, so remedy of revision is not available. It is in view of this legal position petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Section 104 of the Constitution of J&K State.
4. On behalf of respondent (plaintiff) Mr. Vikram Singh Advocate has entered appearance being on caveat, as such, caveat Nos.624/2012 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.