SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(J&K) 235

HASNAIN MASSODI
Nazira Begum and Another – Appellant
Versus
State J&K and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
None
M.I. Qadri Advocate General for Respondents 1to5

1. On 23rd September, 2011 Shri Parvez Imroz Advocate, learned Counsel for the petitioners addressed arguments at length and referred to the facts and events reflected in the petition and documents appended thereto that, according to Mr. P.Imroz must persuade the Court to grant reliefs sought in the petition. On 30th September 2011, Shri Prashant Bhushan, Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners, concluded arguments in presence of Mr. Magray Senior Additional Advocate General Counsel for the respondents. Against the backdrop of case set up and arguments advanced, Learned Advocate General/Counsel on behalf of the State Government, was requested to assist the Court on the next date of hearing. The respondents were given liberty to submit written arguments, if so advised. Learned Advocate General, accordingly, submitted written arguments, which are taken on record.

2. Heard and perused the petition with it s annexures and material available on record.

3. S/Shri Fazal Hussain Dar, Fareed Hussain Dar Son of Fazal Hussain, Mohamad Hussain Son of Abdul Razaq, Talib Hussain Son of Shri Ghulam Nabi Lone all Residents of village Malani Tehsil Baderwah, were allegedly abducted on 3

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top