JAMMU & KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Hasnain Massodi, J.
Abdul Gani Rather -Appellant
Versus
Fayaz Ahmad Khan & Ors. -Resopndent
Cr. Rev. No. 06/2002, IA (cr) No. 140/2009
Decided On : 04-02-2012
Criminal Revision - Disputed Land Possession - Section 145 Cr. P.C - [Section 145 Cr. P.C] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which deals with disputes regarding possession of immovable property likely to threaten peace and public order. The court emphasized that the magistrate's role is to determine actual possession of the disputed property and prevent breach of peace, without deciding entitlement or title of the parties. The court highlighted the purpose of the provision to maintain peace and tranquility and prevent parties from using muscle power to settle disputes.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner claimed ownership and possession of a chunk of land, alleging interference by the respondents. The respondents were found to be in actual possession of the disputed land, leading to the petitioner filing a revision petition seeking to set aside the order.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the orders of the learned Magistrate and the Revisional Court did not suffer from any illegality or impropriety, and thus dismissed the revision petition.
Issues: The issues revolved around the possession of the disputed land, the application of Section 145 Cr. P.C, and the legality of the orders of the Magistrate and the Revisional Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the magistrate's role under Section 145 Cr. P.C is to determine actual possession of the disputed property and prevent breach of peace, without deciding entitlement or title of the parties.
Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed as the court found no illegality or impropriety in the orders of the Magistrate and the Revisional Court.
2. The Criminal Revision on hand arises in the following background.
3. The petitioner on 24.01.2001 approached learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar with an application under Section 145 Cr. P. C. The application was transferred to JMIC (Sub Registrar), Srinagar for its disposal under law. The-petitioner's case was that he was owner in possession of a chunk of land measuring 5 Marias comprising Survey No. 27 Min Khewat No. 4 situated at Firdous Colony Eidgah, Srinagar; that the property in question was purchased by the petitioner through two sale deeds registered on 13.08.1977 and 31.01.1983; that about a month prior to the filing of the application, the respondents without any cause started interfering in petitioner's possession over 1&1/2 Maria out of the aforesaid chunk of land and the matter was brought to the notice of Intizamia Committee of Firdous Bagh Aali Masjid, Srinagar and the Committee in turn referred the matter to the Superintendent of Police. It was further pleaded that Superintendent of Police transmitted the matter to SHO Police Station Safakadal, who filed an application under Section 145 Cr. P. C. before Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar concerned; that Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar vide order dated 20th January, 2001, declined to entertain the matter as according to him it fell beyond his jurisdiction and advised SHO Police Station, Safakadal to approach the regular Court (Judicial Magistrate 1st Class). The petitioner complained that as SHO Police Station Safakadal ignored to move the regular Court, the respondents got emboldened, tress-passed into 1&1/2 Maria strip and by resorting to muscle power, constructed a Tin Shed on the said strip, though the petitioner had already dumped building material on the disputed property. It was further pleaded that there was threat, to the public peace and tranquility, constraining the petitioner to file application under Section 145 Cr. P.C.
4. Learned Magistrate, after preliminary order was drawn in terms of Section 145(1) Cr. P. C., issued notice to the parties to submit their written claims as regards possession of the disputed property and evidence in the shape of duly verified affidavits in support of their respective claims. On a separate application under Section 145 (4) Proviso 3, learned Magistrate attached the property and entrusted it to SHO Police Station Safakadal as Supradar of the property.
5. The parties filed their written statements as also evidence in the shape of affidavits and other documents in support of their respective stands. Learned Magistrate after going through the written statements and the evidence brought on file and making a threadbare discussion of the evidence and assessing its creditworthiness, recorded satisfaction that the respondent No. 1 was in actual possession of the disputed land on the date the preliminary order dated 30.03.2002 was framed and within two months immediately there before. Resultantly, respondent Fayaz Ahamd Khan was held entitled to the possession of disputed land till he was evicted therefrom in due course of l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.