JAMMU & KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Hasnain Massodi, J.
Union of India & Anr. -Appellant
Versus
State of J&K & Ors. -Resopndent
OWP No. 1658/2011, CMP No 243/2012
Decided On : 04-07-2012
Abduction - Army Act - Section 69, 70 - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The case involved allegations of abduction and murder of civilians by Army personnel in a fake encounter to claim rewards and promotions. The accused were not handed over to the Investigating Officer and the charge-sheet was presented in the absence of the accused Army personnel.
Finding of the Court:
The Chief Judicial Magistrate's order and the Revisional Court's order were quashed as they erred in interpreting the provisions of the Army Act and the Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court-Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983. The accused Army personnel were deemed to be on 'active service' at the time of the alleged offences, and the Magistrate was competent to proceed in the matter in accordance with the procedure laid down in the rules, even in the absence of the accused Army personnel.
Ratio Decidendi: The accused Army personnel were deemed to be on 'active service' at the time of the alleged offences, and the Magistrate was competent to proceed in the matter in accordance with the procedure laid down in the rules, even in the absence of the accused Army personnel.
Final Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate was directed to proceed in the matter in accordance with the rules and issue notice to the Commanding Officer. The accused Army personnel were deemed to be on 'active service' at the time of the alleged offences, and the Magistrate was competent to proceed in the matter in the absence of the accused Army personnel.
2. The investigation was taken over by Shri Shakeel Ahmad, Inspector 4459 NGO. The material collected during investigation allegedly revealed that Shri Bashir Ahmad Lone S/o Ghulam Nabi Lone Resident of Nadihal, Abdul Hamid Bhat S/o Abdul Gaffar Bhat Resident of Kawhar Sheen and Abbas Hussain Shah S/o Kalander Shah Resident of Shadrah, Kamalkote, Uri, hatched a criminal con#31;spiracy with Colonel D. K. Pathania Commanding Officer, Major Moriya, Adjutant, and Major Opendera, all belonging to 4th Rajput and five other members of the Armed Forces, to abduct/entice civilians using bait of employment, eliminate the abductees in a fake encounter and claim cash rewards and promotions and that in execution of criminal conspiracy so hatched Shri Bashir Ahmad Lone, Abdul Hamid Bhat and Abbas Hussain Shah abducted three civilians namely Shazad Ahmad Khan, Riyaz Ahmad Lone and Mohammad Shafi Lone, handed them over to Army Officers and eliminated them in a fake encounter at Sonapindi in Machil Sector and projected before the authorities that three civilians were militants and had been killed in a successful military operation, conducted by Colonel D. K. Pathania and others. The object was to collect the rewards and promotions that would come their way for eliminating the so called militants. S. Shri Bashir Ahmad Lone and his alleged accompanies-party to the said conspiracy, were paid Rs. 1,50,000/- in cash. The material collected during investigation and the statements of the witnesses recorded, made the Investigating Officer to conclude that the accused-08 Army personnel and three civilians had committed offence punishable under Section 364,302,120-B and 34 RFC. The investigation was concluded as proved against the accused and the charge-sheet presented in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sopore, on 15th July, 2010.
3. Though the Superintendent of Police, Sopore, vide letters dated 24th June, 2010 and 30th June, 2010, made a request to the Commander, 53 INF Brigade to hand over Colonel D. K. Pathania, Commanding Officer, 4th Rajput and seven other Army personnel to the Investigating Officer, yet the Army personnel towards whom the needle of suspicion pointed were not handed over to the Investigating Officer. The Brigade Commanding Officer, in reply to the aforesaid communica#31;tions informed the Superintendent of Police that a "Court of Enquiry" had been ordered by the Army authorities and the Army personnel sought to be handed over were essential witnesses in the said "Court of Enquiry". The Officer however, volunteered to make available the aforesaid Army personnel for question ing/in#31;vestigation within the Army premises. The stand was reiterated in communication dated 19th July, 2010 of Colonel Adjutant General for General Officer Commanding to the DIG, Baramulla. The charge-sheet in the circumstances was presented before the Chief Judicial Magistrate in absence of Colonel D.K. Pathania and other 07 Army personnel, liste
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab (1995) 1 SCC 90 (Relied on) (Para 19)
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.