SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(J&K) 578

HASNAIN MASSODI
Azhar Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A. Bhat, Advocate for Petitioners.
Gagan Basotra, AAG for Respon#31;dents.

Challenge to order No. DMK/PSA/2011/48-53 dated 14.05.2011, of District Mag#31;istrate, Kishtwar - respondent No.2 herein, whereby one Shri Azhar Ali son of Ghulam Mohd Butt resident of Village Kejai Tehsil Padder District Kishtwar (hereinafter referred to as "detenue") has been placed under preventive de#31;tention, must succeed for following rea#31;sons:-

1. Article 22(5) Constitution of In#31;dia provides a precious and valuable right to a person detained under pre#31;ventive detention law - J&K Public Safety Act 1978, to make a representa#31;tion against his detention. It needs no emphasis that a detenue, on whom pre#31;ventive detention order is slapped, is held in custody without a formal charge and trial. The detenue is held in cus#31;tody on a mere suspicion that his ap#31;prehended activities may be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order or security of the State. Article 22(5), Con#31;stitution of India and Section 13 of the Act, thus make it obligatory for Detain#31;ing Authority to provide detenue an earliest opportunity of making an effec#31;tive and meaningful representation against his detention. The object is to enable detenue to convince Detaining Authority a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top