SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(J&K) 506

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ATTAR
Kasturi Lal – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Parihar, AAG – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muzaffar Hussain Attar, Judge

1. The claim of the petitioner in this writ petition is that in the year 1993, respondent no. 2 identified village Karole Krishna as an appropriate block under the component village Wood Lot for raising closures under the said scheme. It is pleaded in the writ petition that respondents 3 to 5 approached deceased father of petitioner and put a proposal for plantation (raising of closures) and gave assurance that two persons of family would be provided employment in the department in addition to sharing of the proceeds out of the closures. It is also pleaded that deceased father of the petitioner handed over the possession of over 35 hectres of land to the respondents in May 1993. Further case set out in the writ petition is that petitioner and respondent no. 6 were engaged as daily rated workers in August, 1993 in the office of respondent no. 4 immediately after possession of the land was handed over to the respondents. It is also pleaded that the respondents have assured that services of the petitioner and respondent no. 6 would be regularised in the near future. Further, case of the petitioner is that he worked at Karole Kri



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top