SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(J&K) 50

M.M.KUMAR, HASNAIN MASSODI
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Dharam Chand & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents:K.S. Johal, Sr. Adv. Amit Gupta, Advocates.

Massodi, J.:--

1. Dharam Chand R/o Nekowal P.O. Sai Tehsil R.S. Pura, a member of the armed forces, breathed his last on 1984. He was amongst other survived by his wife Smt. Pushpa Devi present appellant and his father Shri Dharam Chand respondent No. 1 herein.

2. The appellant as a nominee of her deceased husband received an amount of Rs. 60,000/- from Life Insurance Corporation of India on account of life insurance policy taken by her deceased husband. She deposited the amount in her bank account. However, an amount of Rs. 50,000/- out of the deposited amount was drawn by her and deposited under a joint FDR No. QDQ/913109 dated 8-3-1991 in her and her father-in-laws name.

3. The appellant commenced a suit in the High Court on 09-10-1991. The suit was transferred to District Court, Jammu and was registered on 21st September 1993. The appellant pleaded that she was fraudulently induced by the respondent to deposit the amount under joint FDR on a false promise that her marriage would be solemnized to Baghwan Dass brother of her deceased husband and son of the respondent No. 1.

4. The appellant’s case was that once she fell in a trap and deposited the amount under joint FDR, she was hara
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top