MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
S. Hazara Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Singh & Another – Respondent
2. The petitioner claimed to have superior right of purchase but notice as was required to be served upon him in terms of Section 18 of the Jammu and Kashmir Right of Prior Purchase Act, 1993, has not been issued at all.
3. It is only on 5-3-2010, when according to him, respondent No. 2 (Vendee) tried to enter upon the land in question, he gained knowledge about the execution of the Sale Deed and attestation of the Mutation, therefore, has filed suit for enforcement of his right of prior purchase in the year 2010, i.e. after more than eight years from the date of execution of Sale Deed.
4. The respondents have resisted the suit and in the written statement projected various grounds which include limitation, as such, have claimed that the suit is time barred.
5. On the basis of the respective pleadings of the partie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.