SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 60

JANAK RAJ KOTWAL
Neena Mahendru – Appellant
Versus
Pal Infrastructure Solutions – Respondent


ORDER :

This is a petition under section 561-A, Cr. P. C. seeking quashing of proceedings against the petitioner in a complaint for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for the Act) filed by herein respondent and the summoning order dated 3.10.2013, whereby learned trial Magistrate has issued process against the petitioner.

2. Facts, which are relevant, briefly, are that in the complaint, respondent (complainant) has arraigned M/s. R. N. Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. as accused No. 1 and petitioner, Neena Mahendru, as accused No. 2. Accused No. 1 is said to be a company and has been arraigned through one Suraj Mahendru as its Managing Director. Petitioner (accused No. 2) has been arraigned in her capacity as a Director of the company. Case set up by the respondent in the complaint, briefly, is that both the accused persons are managing the affairs of the company and they had approached the respondent for purchase of various spare parts. In order to discharge a liability of Rs. 8, 28,282/- incurred by the accused company as cost of spare parts and service charges supplied by the respondent, the company issued two cheques, being cheque No. 613283 dated 22.07.2013 valuing















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top