Ab.Rashid Bhat
Mohd. Ismail Padder – Appellant
Versus
Ab. Salam Padder – Respondent
2. Briefly put, the circumstances giving rise to the present revision petition are that after the mutation Nos. 2026, 2116, 2470, 2478 and 2591 were attested by Tehsildar Dooru, the same were challenged by Abdul Salam Padder (the respondent No. 1 in the present Revision petition) by way of an appeal before the Commissioner Agrarian Reforms, Anantnag on 20-01-2001. The Ld. Commissioner while disposing of the appeal vide his order dated 16-06-2005 set aside the mutations attested by Tehsildar Dooru and simultaneously ordered for de novo inquiry by Tehsildar concerned. The operative part of the said order reads as under:-
"The appeals are accepted and the impugned mutations are set aside. The matter is remanded to Tehsildar concerned for denovo inquiry on spot in presence of parties and to attest fresh mutations in view of the partition made by the parties".
3. This order made by the Ld. Commissioner was not cha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.