Sanjay Gupta
Viran Devi – Appellant
Versus
Prima – Respondent
2. Petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the grounds that, she was owner of land and she filed a resumption application before Tehsildar. That Naib Tehsildar jammu attested that mutation no; 209 u/s 7 and rejected his application form without assigning the reason. That Naib Tehsildar was not competent under Agrarian Reforms Act to attest the mutation. That resumption application is always presumed to be disputed matter and so Niab Tehsildar was not competent to attest the mutation. That instructions given in standing order 23-A have not been followed. That no notice was issued to her by Mutating Officer. That land is situated at village Chack Pouni Bandh Brahamana, whereas mutation has been attested at Village Dumal. That Court below has dismissed th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.