Sanjay Gupta
Ashwani Kumar Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal – Respondent
2. Petitioner has stated in his revision petition that, he is owner in possession of land measuring 15 kanals 11 marklas under Kh. No. 164, situated at village Ratnal tehsil Bishnah. That petitioner was firstly declared as prospective owner of land in term of mutation no. 745 attested on 10.12.88 u/s 4 of Agr.Ref.Act. That by virtue of mutation no. 745/1 dt. 21.4.89 attested u/s 8 of Agrarian Reform Act; ownership right was conferred upon him. That respondent no. 1 filed appeal before Court below against mutation. Appeal was dismissed due non-prosecution on 23.7.2011. That respondent no. 1 moved an application for restoration of appeal much after period of limitation before Court below. That Court below issued notice and next date was fixed on 17.11.2011.
3. That on 15.10.2011 court below passed an order, whereby both retraining order as well a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.