SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(J&K) 777

Sanjay Gupta
Ashwani Kumar Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal – Respondent


1. Petitioners has challenged the order dt. 15.11.2011, passed by Jt. Agr. Reforms Commissioner Jammu, by virtue of which parties to the litigation have been directed to maintain status quo and petitioner has been restrained on spot, in respect of land measuring 15 kanals 11marlas under Khasra no. 164 situated at village Ratnal Tehsil bishnah.

2. Petitioner has stated in his revision petition that, he is owner in possession of land measuring 15 kanals 11 marklas under Kh. No. 164, situated at village Ratnal tehsil Bishnah. That petitioner was firstly declared as prospective owner of land in term of mutation no. 745 attested on 10.12.88 u/s 4 of Agr.Ref.Act. That by virtue of mutation no. 745/1 dt. 21.4.89 attested u/s 8 of Agrarian Reform Act; ownership right was conferred upon him. That respondent no. 1 filed appeal before Court below against mutation. Appeal was dismissed due non-prosecution on 23.7.2011. That respondent no. 1 moved an application for restoration of appeal much after period of limitation before Court below. That Court below issued notice and next date was fixed on 17.11.2011.

3. That on 15.10.2011 court below passed an order, whereby both retraining order as well a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top