Sanjay Gupta
Naib Chand – Appellant
Versus
Dewan Chand – Respondent
2. This appeal was filed before court below on the grounds, that mutations have been attested in exparte. That he was at Jammu in connection with his job for the last 20-28 years. That respondent taking the advantage of the fact, got mutation attested in his favour and has also constructed shops on the land. That land in question was in his personal cultivation in Kharief 1971, but in the year 1981, the patwari manipulated the entries on the name of respondent. That as per Agr. Ref. Act, if the tenant is out of possession of land in kharief 1971, then he has no right on the land in term of section 4 and 8 of the Act. That before changing the entries in revenue records, the mutating Officer is obliged to call owners of land.
3. The Court below after hearin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.