SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 295

G.D.Sharma, B.L.Saraf
Amit Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
Fiat India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N. Raina , Arvind Khajuria.

Per Justice G.D. Sharma

1. The complainant namely, Mr. Amit Bakshi filed this complaint on 09.07.2004 with the allegations that he purchased Palio 1.9, ELX, Chassis No. 08051474, Engine No. 0059601 H, grey Colour for fixed price of Rs 4,94,584/-. The complainant has stated that out of the said sale price, an amount of Rs. 1,24,584/- was paid as booking amount in cash to OP no.2 and the balance price amount in the sum of Rs. 3,70,000/- was paid at the time of delivery through J&K Bank Ltd. Shalamar , Jammu. It is further stated that vehicle was delivered to him but unfortunately the sale letter and Form 22 were not given to the complainant by OP no.2 at the time of delivery of the vehicle. The vehicle was delivered on 05.09.2003 and despite repeated requests the above said documents have not been given to the complainant. It is also alleged that registered notice dated 25.05.2004 was served upon the OPs wherein it was reiterated that despite repeated visits being made, the above stated two required documents were not delivered. The car in question could not be made road worthy because of the lack of the above stated two requisite documents and in their absence the vehicle could not b













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top