SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(J&K) 764

Sanjay Gupta
Premu – Appellant
Versus
Billu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amrit Sarin, Nemo.

1. This revision petition has been filed by petitioner against the order of Addl. Dy. Commissioner, Udhampur with powers of Agr. Reforms Commissioner, by virtue of which he has remanded the case to Tehsildar for denovo enquiry.

2. Petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the grounds that, he is brother of respondents and is in possession of land measuring 22 kanals under khasra no. 56, 57 and 58 at village Madha Tehsil Chenani District Udhampur. That a mutation no. 1594 has already been attested in his favour 0n 12.12.2003. That respondent no. 1 unnecessarily and without any basis has dragged the petitioner in a false litigation by filing appeal before Agrarian reform commissioner and on this Tehsildar was directed to hold enquiry with regard to possession and cultivation of the petitioner. Tehsildar during enquiry recorded statements of respondents and attested the mutation no. 1594 on 12.12.2003 in presence of other witnesses. Respondent no; 1 again filed appeal and 25.3.2004 and it was decided on 18.10.2007.

3. The Court below has again remanded the case to Tehsildar Chenani for fresh enquiry in presence of parties.

4. Petitioner has stated in revision that, order of Court b






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top