Sanjay Gupta
Premu – Appellant
Versus
Billu – Respondent
2. Petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the grounds that, he is brother of respondents and is in possession of land measuring 22 kanals under khasra no. 56, 57 and 58 at village Madha Tehsil Chenani District Udhampur. That a mutation no. 1594 has already been attested in his favour 0n 12.12.2003. That respondent no. 1 unnecessarily and without any basis has dragged the petitioner in a false litigation by filing appeal before Agrarian reform commissioner and on this Tehsildar was directed to hold enquiry with regard to possession and cultivation of the petitioner. Tehsildar during enquiry recorded statements of respondents and attested the mutation no. 1594 on 12.12.2003 in presence of other witnesses. Respondent no; 1 again filed appeal and 25.3.2004 and it was decided on 18.10.2007.
3. The Court below has again remanded the case to Tehsildar Chenani for fresh enquiry in presence of parties.
4. Petitioner has stated in revision that, order of Court b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.