SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(J&K) 564

Mansoor Ahmad Mir
State Of J&K – Appellant
Versus
Altaf Hussain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.A. Naik, Mohd. Amin Khan, M.Y. Bhat, J.H. Reshi, Mohd. Amin Khan, B.A. Misri, S.A. Naik.

1. Since common question of fact and law is involved in all these Civil 1st Appeals/Cross Appeals, I deem it proper to dispose of all the appeals by this common judgment.

2. CIA No. 203-A/2009

Collector, LAWDA passed the award in favour of claimants-land owners on 19.03.2002. Claimants while disputing the adequacy of compensation laid a motion before the Collector for making reference to the concerned District Judge. Collector, LAWDA, accordingly, made a reference to the Principal District Judge, Srinagar, was diarized as Reference No. 3/2002. Learned District Judge after examining/scanning the evidence and other documents enhanced the compensation from Rs. 2.30 lacs to Rs. 4.00 lacs per kanal and also awarded compensation under the head wooden poles and warbed wires vide judgment dated 14.10.2008. State feeling aggrieved has filed the instant appeal questioning the same. Claimants have not questioned the judgment of reference court by the medium of any cross appeal.

3. CIA No. 206/2009

Collector, LAWDA passed the award in favour of claimants-land owners on 12.11.2001. Claimants while disputing the adequacy of compensation laid a motion before the Collector for making reference to the


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top