SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(J&K) 449

Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Shiv Krishan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Sethi, Parimoksh Seth, Sumit Nayyar, Gagan Basotra.

1. Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court in terms of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, Cr.P.C.) read with the provisions of J&K Prevention and Suppression of Sabotages Act, 1965 (for short, the Sabotages Act) for grant of bail in FIR No. 33/2013 registered at Police Station Thathri, District Doda, under section 307 of Ranbir Penal Code (for short, RPC); 3/4 of Explosives Substances Act, 1908; 3/25, 7/27 of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 3 of the Sabotages Act.

2. It is contended that petitioner no. l is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. Further, it is contended that he has done commendable job while taking part in anti-insurgency operations. He was given out-of-turn promotion to the post of Sub Inspector in the year 2005. He was performing his duties with utmost zeal and dedication and has played a great role in killing as well as making dreaded militants to surrender and also effecting recovery of huge arms and ammunition. Thus, it is pleaded that petitioner no. l has unblemished service record, as he has earned eight medals/commendation certificates including President's Police Medal, Sher-e-Kashmir Gallantry Award, DG Comme



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top