Madan Lal
Vinod Kalra – Appellant
Versus
Custodian Evacuee Property, Jammu – Respondent
2. Further stated that respondent no. 2 is the son of the petitioner. Petitioner was also running the business of stationery in the said allotted EP shop. In the year 2004 the respondent in connivance with the Custodian and other staff of the EP Department, preferred an application before the then Custodian EP Jammu for allotment of the said shop in his name. The Custodian without serving any show cause notice required under rule 14 of the of the Rules framed under the Evacuees' (Administration of Property) Act 2006 illegally and i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.