SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 94

JANAK RAJ KOTWAL
Prithvi Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vikas Mangotra, Deepika Mahajan.

1. Petitioner was enrolled in Central Reserve Police Force (for short the Force), on 02.07.1973 under Force No. 830764613 and in the course of time was promoted to the rank of HCI/GO and posted in 158 Bn. which was stationed at a place called Kadarpur in State of Haryana.

2. This writ petition by the petitioner is directed against order No. P-VIII-2/2005-EC-II dated 08.09.2005 issued by the commandant, 158 BN. (respondent No. 3) whereby, pursuant to departmental inquiry and Inquiry Officer's report dated 08.04.2005, punishment of `Compulsory Retirement' from service in terms of section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 (for short the Act) read with Rule 27 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 (for short the Rules) has been imposed upon the petitioner. Besides, petitioner has also assailed order dated 18.08.2006 passed in appeal by Additional Director General of the Force, order dated 17.05.2007 passed by respondent No.2 in the second appeal and order dated 29.11.2007 passed by respondent No.1 in a representation submitted by the petitioner. Petitioner, thus, seeks writ of certiorari setting aside and quashing of order dated 08.09.2005, order-dated 18.06.











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top