SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(J&K) 618

A.K.Shan
Guddi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Amroo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Gupta.

1. The order of Commissioner Agrarian Reforms Udhampur dated 22.10.2005 refusing to set aside the order passed on mutation No:435 dated 28.6.1993 under Section 8 of the Agrarian Reforms Act in favour of respondents No: 1 and 2, has been assailed in this revision petition and sought to be set aside by the petitioner on the grounds mentioned in the memo of revision.

2. The facts giving rise to filing of the present revision petition are as under:-

Faquiroo and his son Bhagu were the individual tenants of the land mentioned in the appeal situated in village Kakaryal Tehsil Udhampur.

Accordingly mutation Nos:340 and 341 were attested by the concerned Revenue Officer declaring them prospective owners of the land. Subsequently Faquiroo died and thereafter his son Bhagu expired in the year 1988.

Faquiroo had only one son named above who had married two women. From the 1st wife respondents were born and from 2nd the petitioner. After the death of Faquiroo and Bhagu Tehsildar (Settlement) Udhampur attested mutation under Section 8 of the Agrarian Reforms Act on 28.6.1993 and conferred the rights of ownerships upon respondent Nos: 1 and 2.

3. Aggrieved by the said mutation petitioner preferred an




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top