Sanjay Gupta
Gurnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Baldev Raj – Respondent
2. Petitioners have challenged the impugned order on the grounds that, they are in physical possession of land and court below has passed order beyond jurisdiction. That court below has not properly seen the record. That court below has exercised jurisdiction which was not vested to him.
3. From the perusal of record it appears that, respondent filed a complaint before Sub-Divisional Magistrate RS.Pura regarding non-providing of possession of land by Custodian Department Jammu in his favour. In the complaint it has been stated that he was allottee of land 4 kanals (kh.no.246/41), 3kanals 4 marals (kh.no.15 ) and 7 kananls 4 maralas ( kh.no.12) and this land was given to one Gian Singh s/o late Duni Chand R/o R/o Kolti Merdian Tehsil R.S.Pura District Jammu for cultivation on the condition that half of the share of crops produced shall be given to him. That said Gian Singh had died and now his sons have occupied the land forcibly and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.