SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(J&K) 727

Sanjay Gupta
Mushtaq Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Dharam Singh – Respondent


1. No one is appearing on behalf of petitioners since 13.5.2011. Counsels for the respondents are present.

2. This revision petition has been filed against the order of Additional Deputy Commissioner Udhampur, with power of Agrarian Reforms Commissioner dated 26.5.2006, by virtue of which he has dismissed two appeals filed by petitioners with regard to land bearing khasra No.503 9 knalas situated at Cholona Tehsil Udhampur.

3. Petitioners have challenged the impugned order on the grounds that, Court below has passed order in very hasty manner. That petitioners were in cultivating possession of land prior to 1971 till today. That mutation U/S 4 of Agrarian Reforms Act has been attested in general way and accordingly mutation U/S 8 of Act has also been attested against the provisions of law. That Court below has ignored the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Court.

4. I have heard counsel for the respondents. I have also gone through the record.

5. From the perusal of record. It appears that petitioners here-in filed two appeals on 13.9.05, one against order dated 16.7.1994 passed by mutating officer, by virtue of which land under khasra No.503 measuring 9 kanals has been attest

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top