SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(J&K) 711

J&K STATE SALES TAX (APPELLATE) TRIBUNAL AT JAMMU
M.K. Hanjura, J.
Dhara Traders -Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Jammu & Anr. -Resopndent
File No. 12-ST-T-J [In the matter of : Appeal against the order dated 22-03-2005 passed by the Dy. Commissioner , Commercial Taxes (Appeals) (Appellate Authority), Jammu for the accounting year 2001-02.]
Decided On : 25-11-2011

Compliance with statutory requirements and adherence to statutory time limits are crucial for the admissibility of appeals under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962.

Headnote:

Sales Tax - Appeal against order of Appellate Authority - Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, Section 11

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Appellate Authority, which was dismissed for failure to file proof of payment of assessed tax and penalty as required by Section 11 of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962. The appellant also failed to file the appeal within the statutory period of three months.

Finding of the Court:

The Court confirmed the order of the Appellate Authority and dismissed the appellant's appeal due to failure to comply with the statutory requirements of Section 11 and for filing the appeal after the statutory period.

Issues: Failure to file proof of payment of assessed tax and penalty, and filing the appeal after the statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi: Compliance with statutory requirements, including the filing of proof of payment as per Section 11, and adherence to the statutory period for filing appeals.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Appellate Authority was confirmed.

1. No one appeared in this appeal on the last two dates and today also the Ld. Counsel for the parties have chosen to remain absent.

2. I have perused and thoughtfully considered the material on record.

3. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 22-03-2005, passed by the Ld. Dy. Commissioner, Sales Tax (Appeals) (Appellate Authority), Jammu, in Appeal No. 398/DCJ/AP/ST/2003-2004. The Appellate Authority has dismissed the appeal of the appellant summarily on the ground that the appellant has not filed proof of payment of 20% of the assessed tax and 50% of the penalty imposed in the order impugned. This is required under clauses (b) & (c) of the 2nd Proviso to Section 11 of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962. He was afforded an opportunity under Notice No: 398/DCJ/AP/ST/2003-2004/809 dated 29-06-2004, to explain the reasons for failure. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant, Sh. Gulshan Gupta, appeared on 03-08-2004, 27-08-2004, 24-09-2004, 05-10-2004 and 18-11-2004, 24-12-2004, 09-02-2005 and01-03-2005 every time seeking further time to do the needful. Ultimately, last opportunity was afforded fixing the case for 15-03-2005, when no body appeared nor was the needful done.

4. What requires consideration is to see whether the order of the Appellate Authority can be maintained on the reasoning projected therein, i.e. whether the appellant was obliged to file proof of the payment of 20% of the assessed tax and 50% of the penalty imposed on him by the Assessing Authority, as per the requirement of clauses (b) and (c) of the 2nd proviso to Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962. In order to have a proper understanding of the matter it will be appropriate to reproduce the relevant excerpts of Section 11 of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, herein below:-

"Section 11:-..Provided further that no appeal shall be entertained by the said authority unless it is satisfied that:-

(a) where all the returns for a year have been filed, the amount of tax due under this Act on the turnover of sales or purchases, as the case may be, admitted by the appellant in the returns filed by him or at any stage in any proceedings under this Act, whichever is higher, has been paid; or

(b) Where some of the returns for a year have not been filed or no return has been filed for such year, the amount of tax due under this Act, admitted by the appellant in the returns, if any, filed by him or at any stage in any proceedings under this Act or 20% of the amount of tax assessed, whichever is higher, has been paid; or

(c) in case the appeal is against the imposition of penalty, 50% of the penalty levied has been paid;

[Provided that the Appellate Authority may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, stay the recovery of the disputed amount of tax and penalty. However, the stay will not cover the amount of tax and penalty payable under clauses (a), (b) and of the 2nd Proviso]

Explanation:- Nothing in this sub-section shall apply to the cases where the Commissioner in exercise of the powers vested under Section 8 makes an order extending the date of payment.

5. From the perusal of the Section 11 Supra, what comes to the fore is that the deposit of 20% of the amount of tax assessed and 50% of the penalty where the appeal is against the order of imposition of penalty, is a statutory requirement. The terms of Section 11 clauses (b) and (c) are mandatory in nature as the word used is "shall". Section 11 (b) and (c) give the Appellate Authority the teeth to proceed in a matter. Filing of the proof of payment of 20% of the amount of tax assessed and 50% of the penalty levied is a condition precedent for lodging an appeal before the Appellate Authority which, as per the explanation added to Section 11, can be relaxed only where the extension of the date of payment, is granted, by an order, made by the Commissioner, in exercise of the powers vested in him under section 8 of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962. This has not









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top