SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(J&K) 360

Hasnain Massodi
Anand Swaroop – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Sethi, Sudershan Sharma, G.S. Thakur.

1. Petitioners and private respondents responded to the Advertisement notice issued by the Jammu & Kashmir Service Selection Board (hereinafter the Board) in 1997-98 inviting applications from eligible candidates for available vacancies of Foresters/Forest Inspector, Divisional cadre Jammu. They participated in the selection process and, on the strength of their merit, found place in the select list published by the Board on May 16th 1998. Petitioners applied under reserve categories, were selected under OBC category (petitioner No.1) and Resident of Backward Area category (petitioners 2 to 7). The private respondents (respondent 4 to 7) appeared in the select list in Open Merit category at Sr. Nos. 21, 27, 30 and 32.

2. The Board on completion of selection process, made recommendation for appointment of selected candidates, to the indenting department. The Government forwarded the list to the concerned agency for verification of antecedents of the selected candidates. As the candidates belonged to different districts of Jammu Division, verification reports were received on different dates. The Government issued appointment order in favour of a selected candidate on receipt of his v



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top