HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Ali Mohammad Magrey, J.
Chandigarh Poultry Centre -Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. -Resopndent
OWP No. 330-2013, CMP No. 440-2013
Decided On : 09-07-2013
Transfer of Contract Carrying Capacity - Government of India, Ministry of Defence - Clause 16 under Chapter II, Registration and Re-valuation of Contractors and Contract Carrying Capacity - The court discussed the provisions contained in Clause 16 under Chapter II, Registration and Re-valuation of Contractors and Contract Carrying Capacity, issued by Government of India, Ministry of Defence letter No. PC / RAKSHA / 63060 / Q / ST-5 / 3633 / D(QS) dated 26 September, 2006 read with GOI, MoD letter no. PC / RAKSHA / 63036 / Q / ST-5 dated 01 September, 2009. The court highlighted the importance of sub-clauses 16 (a) and (e) which state that a Contractor can apply for transfer of his CCC from one Command to another only after three years of his initial registration and that the CCC will not be revised more than once in two years.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to transfer his Contract Carrying Capacity from Northern Command to the Western Command, which was rejected by respondent no.3. The petitioner filed a petition seeking to quash the rejection and for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's request for transfer of CCC was rejected based on valid reasons and that the issues raised in the petition had become academic in nature. The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to make a fresh application for transfer of CCC to the Western Command.
Issues: The issues involved the rejection of the petitioner's request for transfer of Contract Carrying Capacity and the applicability of the provisions contained in Clause 16 under Chapter II, Registration and Re-valuation of Contractors and Contract Carrying Capacity.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's request for transfer of CCC was not eligible within the prescribed time frame and that the issues raised in the petition had become academic in nature.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to make a fresh application for transfer of CCC to the Western Command, outside the prescribed time window, and provided the petitioner with the option to approach the DGST, Integrated Headquarters of MoD (Army) for directions if the request is turned down.
2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is that it (a proprietorship concern) is a Class A Contractor registered with the Northern Command. Its initial Contract Carrying Capacity (for short CCC) was 18 Crores. However, pursuant to a written request made by the petitioner, its CCC to the extent of 5 Crores was transferred on 06.11.2010 to the Western Command. Thus, as from 06.11.2010, it was left with the CCC of 13 Crores with the Northern Command. On 03.10.2012, the petitioner made an application to respondent no.3 requesting therein that its transferred CCC of 5 Crores to HQ Western Command be enhanced to Rs. 13.5 Crores. In the aforesaid communication, the petitioner made reference to paragraph 16(b)(e) of Government of India letter no. PC / RAKSHA / 63060 / Q / ST-5 / 3633 / D(QS) dated 26 September, 2006 governing the subject, wherein it is provided that if a contractor wishes to get upto 75 percent of his CCC transferred to other Command, his Carrying Capacity will not be revised more than once in two years. The petitioner in the said communication stated that the period of two years (from 06.11.2010 to 05.11.2012) in its case would be completed in the processing of its case.
3. It appears that, in response to the aforesaid written request of the petitioner, respondent no. 3 addressed communication dated 08.10.2012 intimating to the petitioner that "MGASC of the present Command, where the contactor is initially registered will, entertain request for transfer of capacity to another Command(s) only when he has seen the performance of the contractor for at least one year in his Command, with effect from the date of his last revision of CCC, if any".
4. The petitioner replied the aforesaid letter of respondent no.3 vide its communication dated 20.10.2012, inter alia, stating therein that the condition relied upon was not applicable in its case as the same was seen at the time of transfer of its CCC in the year 2010 and that no adverse report was found at that time. The petitioner further mentioned in the aforesaid communication that the period of two years will be completed on 05.11.2012, i.e., 15 days after the date of the said communication and that these 15 days would also be consumed in processing the documents with Western Command. The petitioner again made a reminder to the same effect on 05.11.2012, the date the period of two years was completed from the date of last revision in the CCC.
5. The aforesaid communication dated 03.10.2012 followed by the reply dated 20.10.2012 and reminder dated 05.11.2012 remained pending with respondent no.3 for quite long and no decision was taken on the request so made. Aggrieved by the inaction of respondent no.3, petitioner filed OWP no.1564/2012 which came up for consideration before a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 04.01.2013. During the course of hearing, the learned CGSC representing the respondents therein, made a statement that the Union of India may not be averse to take requisite decision on the petitioner's request for transfer of CCC within a week's time. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of on 04.01.2013 itself with a direction to the respondents to take requisite decision as warranted under Rules in force within a week's time.
6. Ultimately, respondent no.3 rejected the req
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.