SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 499

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.
Habib Ullah Sheikh & Ors. -Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K & Ors. -Resopndent
OWP No. 236-2008, OWP No. 891-2007
Decided On : 04-07-2008

Advocates Appeared:
N.A. Kuchai, N.H. Shah, M.A. Beigh.

Individuals lacking specific rights or interests in acquired Kahcharai land cannot challenge its acquisition for public purposes, and the compensation is to be utilized for the benefit of the community.

Headnote:

Kahcharai Land - Encroachment and Acquisition - The court held that the petitioners, who had no individual right or interest in the Kahcharai land, could not challenge the acquisition of the land for public purposes. The compensation for the acquired land was to be utilized for the benefit of the community, and the petitioners, filing in individual capacity, had no standing to seek relief against the Electric Department for the construction of a Grid Station.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners alleged encroachment on Kahcharai land reserved for grazing purposes and challenged the construction of a Grid Station by the Electric Department.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners had no individual right or interest in the Kahcharai land and could not challenge its acquisition for public purposes. The court also noted the non-joinder of necessary parties and the absence of the villagers, who were the rightful beneficiaries of the compensation for the acquired land.

Issues: Encroachment on Kahcharai land, challenge to the construction of Grid Station, non-joinder of necessary parties, individual capacity of the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioners, lacking individual right or interest in the Kahcharai land, could not challenge its acquisition for public purposes. The compensation for the acquired land was to be utilized for the benefit of the community, and the petitioners, filing in individual capacity, had no standing to seek relief against the Electric Department for the construction of a Grid Station.

Final Decision: Both writ petitions were dismissed, and any interim direction was vacated.

1. I deem it proper to decide the above titled petitions by this common judgment because common questions of law are involved in both these writ petitions.

2. It is averred in these petitions that Kahcharai land measuring 204 kanals and 3 marlas falling under survey N.261, 94 kanals 12 marlas tailing under survey No.262 and land measuring 187 kanals falling under survey No. 263 situated at village Nowbugh is reserved for grazing purposes. It is further averred that a portion of it came to be encroached by some inhabitants in league with revenue field staff and a representation came to be made to the revenue officials but without any fruit.

3. Respondents-Electric Department filed reply in both the writ petitions. It is profitable to reproduce para-2 of the reply filed in OWP No.891/2007 herein:

"2. In reply to paras 3 to 7, it is submitted that the petition is not maintainable in the present form, the petitioners have no right to file this writ petition on behalf of the whole population/ zamindaras of village Nowbug Chadoora District Budgam, It is submitted that the proposed construction of the Grid Station has been initiated not only on the demand of villagers of village Nowbug but also as per requirement/ necessity of the same for providing proper and uninterrupted power supply to numbers of villages of Tehsil Chadoora and District Budgam respectively. It was in the year 2005 that the Government through Deputy Commissioner Budgam was requested to make available land for construction of the Grid Station. The revenue authorities identified the land in village Nowbug and accordingly proceedings under land acquisition for land measuring 45 kanals coming under khasra No.263 was initiated, and finally it was in the year 2006, vide order No. DCB Land Acquisition/674/2542-44 dated 4.12.2006 the Assistant Commissioner Revenue Budgam directed the Tehsildar Chadoora to handover the possession of the land (45 kanals) to the answering respondents herein, and as such, the possession over the same of the respondents herein is legal. The petitioners have no right to challenge the possession of the answering respondents herein over the same nor they have any legal right to seek any relief from this Hon’ble Court regarding the construction of the Grid Station. It is submitted that the land in question is already in possession of the answering respondents herein. The raising of the wall around the said piece of land is in progress and near about 35% of the work has been completed. The Government has already allotted the funds for the construction of the Grid station on spot and same is to be completed during this summer season in order to avoid complicacy and hardships of the people in the next winter. The relevant documents which shows that the authorities have completed all the legal formalities before handing over of the possession of land to the answering respondents herein. The contention of the petitions to the extent that the answering respondents are raising construction on spot without any competence or legal right is therefore without any force. The writ petition is as such liable to be dismissed."

4. Admittedly, the land in question is a Kacharai land-- reserved for grazing purposes. The petitioners have no individual right or interest in the said land. Neither the writ petitions have filed the writ petitions in representative capacity nor permission was sought for filing the writ petitions.

5. It is also not mentioned in the writ petitions who are the persons who have encroached or encroaching upon the `Kahcharai land’. Thus, both the writ petitions suffer from non-joinder of necessary parties. The petitioners have no right or interest over the said land. It is virtually a property of the government but meant for grazing purposes. If Kahcharai land is to be acquired for any public purpose the amount is to be spent for welfare of the community.

6. Division Bench of this court in case titled Ghulam Mohammad Bhat & Ors. Vs State and Anr., r




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top