SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 293

Sunil Hali
Akhter Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Nanki Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Parihar, S.S. Lehar, Akshay Anand.

1. Aggrieved by order dated 4.02.2008 passed by learned Sub Judge, Poonch in Execution Application, whereby a direction has been issued to the petitioner to comply with the said order, the petitioner has filed this revision petition.

2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the case, following facts are to be noted:

3. A compromise decree came to be passed by the learned Sub Judge, Poonch on 8.3.1999, on the compromise arrived at between respondent no. 1 and respondents 2 to 4. It transpires that present petitioner had purchased 4 marlas of land constituting the suit property from the original owner. As a result of the compromise decree, the judgment debtors were required to leave three feet gap from the house of the decree holder. It was also settled that judgment debtors shall construct their house after leaving 11’ -9" gap from the boundary wall. The decree further contends that judgment debtors shall not divert the flow of the water towards the land and house of the decree holder. After passing of the decree, land in question was purchased by the present petitioner.

4. On an application filed before the executing court, a direction was issued to the Tehsildar, Haveli





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top