SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 318

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Qadri Nazir Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.A. Jan, T.H. Khawja.

1. Petitioners among others were also appointed as Guards in pay scale of Rs.2610-3540 vide order Nos.285/ADM of 1998 dated 19.12.1998 and 206/Adm of 1999 dated 26.5.1999 respectively. The said appointments were challenged and finally the matter landed up in the Apex Court and the Hon’ble Apex Court vide order dated 16th of September, 2004 quashed all such appointments and issued the following directions:-

"1. All the vacant posts shall be notified for appointment and applications called for in accordance with the Rules within six months from the date of the receipt of the judgment.

2. All the appellants herein may be permitted to submit application for appointment against such notification.

3. As regards the upper age limit, these appellants shall be given relaxation but there shall not be any relaxation in the matter of the basic qualification for appointment to Class IV posts.

4. The appellants may be allowed to continue in service till such regular recruitments are made and these posts are filled up by a regular process of appointment."

2. In compliance thereof, advertisement notice No.1 of 2005 dated 2.4.2005 came to be issued. Petitioners also competed, were selected among others









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top