SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(J&K) 669

Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Zameer Ahmad Wagay – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M A. Khan, A.R. Bhat.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 15th of March, 2010 whereby application moved by plaintiff-petitioner came to be dismissed, hereinafter for short as impugned order.

2. A suit titled as Zameer Ahmad Wagay v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others was instituted by the petitioner-plaintiff before the trial court, came to be decreed vide judgment and order dated 31st of July, 2009.

3. Plaintiff noticed that a mistake had crept in and laid a motion for its correction vis-a-vis changing the parentage of the plaintiff-applicant from Abdul Rahman Wagay to Abdul Rahim Wagay.

4. Virtually the petitioner had sought to correct, not the first or the last name of the parentage but the middle name viz. Rahim in place of Rahman.

5. The table amendment sought for was resisted by the other side and the application came to be dismissed vide the impugned order.

6. Heard. Perused.

7. The trial court has fallen in error while recording the impugned order. It also appears that learned counsel for the parties had not properly assisted the trial court resulting in recording the illegal, impugned order.

8. The Civil Court is vested with ample powers to rectify the inadvertent errors c













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top