Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Zameer Ahmad Wagay – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. A suit titled as Zameer Ahmad Wagay v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others was instituted by the petitioner-plaintiff before the trial court, came to be decreed vide judgment and order dated 31st of July, 2009.
3. Plaintiff noticed that a mistake had crept in and laid a motion for its correction vis-a-vis changing the parentage of the plaintiff-applicant from Abdul Rahman Wagay to Abdul Rahim Wagay.
4. Virtually the petitioner had sought to correct, not the first or the last name of the parentage but the middle name viz. Rahim in place of Rahman.
5. The table amendment sought for was resisted by the other side and the application came to be dismissed vide the impugned order.
6. Heard. Perused.
7. The trial court has fallen in error while recording the impugned order. It also appears that learned counsel for the parties had not properly assisted the trial court resulting in recording the illegal, impugned order.
8. The Civil Court is vested with ample powers to rectify the inadvertent errors c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.