SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 407

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ATTAR
Amrit Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Sharma.

1. This bail application is filed on behalf of four accused persons. Out of these four accused persons, petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 have been granted interim bail by this Court on 03.03.2009 and that interim bail is continuing till date.

2. FIR No. 09/08 under Section 498-A read with Section 34 RPC was filed against the accused-petitioners on 15.02.2008. The occurrence had allegedly taken place on 20.01.2008 and the accused were arrested on 17.02.2008. Report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was filed before the Court of competent jurisdiction. The bail application was initially filed before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajouri on 03.03.2008, which was rejected on 10.03.2008. One more bail application was filed by the accused-persons on 15.03.2008, which was also rejected on 10.05.2008. The accused-persons thereafter filed another bail application before learned Sessions Judge, Rajouri, which was rejected on 11.09.2008.

3. Heard learned counsel for petitioners. Considered the matter.

4. It is submitted at the Bar by learned counsel for the petitioners that out of 18 listed prosecution witnesses, 15 have been examined by the learned trial Judge. When the bail application was considered



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top