SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 426

Hasnain Massodi
Manzoor Ahmad Dar – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.Y. Bhat, Nusrat Razak.

1. The petitioner-an Executive Engineer in Public Works Department of the State Government, is alleged to have in the year-2005 and 2006, entered into criminal conspiracy with other accused and in execution of conspiracy, so hatched to have accepted the supplies of 432 meters of M.S. Pipes at exorbitant rates with an intention to confer undue benefit upon himself and conspirators and exposed the State Treasury to monetary loss. The petitioner - accused, by acting in the aforesaid manner, is alleged to have committed offence punishable under section 5(2)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act read with 120-B of Ranbir Penal Code.

2. The charge sheet, though presented on 5th June 2008, is yet to be taken to the take off stage. The Trial court till date has not been in a position to pass orders under section 251-A Code of Criminal Procedure, so that, in the event the petitioner-accused and his co-accused are formally charged of the offences alleged in the charge sheet, the trial commences and is taken to its logical end. Be that as it may, let us focus on the present controversy.

3. The petitioner-accused on 18th September 2008 filed an application before the Trial Court, praying therein th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top