SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 474

Sunil Hali
Rajni Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhinav Sharma, Shaishta Hakim, Rahul Pant.

1. Restoration of seniority of respondent no.4 as Ophthalmic Assistant with effect from 26.04.1988 as also his promotion as Senior Refractionist with effect from 07.09.1994 is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.

2. The petitioner and respondent no.4 are locked in a litigative process for more than one and a half decade. One trying to unsettle the position of the other. In order to understand the controversy involved in this petition, certain facts are required to be noted:-

3. Petitioner came to be appointed as a Refractionist in Government Medical College Jammu on adhoc basis in the year 1989. Said appointment was regularized with effect from 11.09.1989. Respondent no.4 was appointed as Ophthalmic Assistant in the year 1988 in the Health Department. The appointment of the petitioner was challenged by respondent no.4 in SWP no. 441/1990 on the ground that she was not eligible to be appointed as a Refractionist. It seems that respondent no.4 withdrew the said writ petition on the assurance of the State that he would be considered for appointment in the Medical Education Department. The services of respondent no.4 came to be transferred from the Health Department to































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top