SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 625

Hasnain Massodi
Vethesta Constructions--Good Luck Constructions – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.Q. Bhat, Neeru Goswami.

1. Heard. Admit.

2. The petition, having regard to controversy involved, is with the consent of learned counsel for the parties taken up for final disposal, at the initial stage.

M/s Vethestha Constructions and M/s Good Luck Constructions -- two construction companies, as a joint venture, responded to the Notice inviting tenders, issued by respondent No.3 on 12.09.2008, for upgradation of road from Achabal Soumbran to Chatpal. The joint venture/petitioner herein bagged the contract for upgradation of the aforementioned road at a cost of Rs.18,86,81,944.00 (Rupees eighteen crores, eighty six lacs, eighty one thousand, nine hundred and forty four only) and letter of acceptance No.CE/PMGSY/J&K/Sgr/667-83 dated 23rd January 2009 was duly delivered to the petitioner. The petitioner was required to furnish performance security in the form of Bank Guarantee/Fixed Deposit Receipt for an amount of Rs.47.17 Lacs, within a period of ten days. The petitioner duly furnished the Performance Bank Guarantee - BG No.04/2009 dated 29th May 2009 from J&K Bank Limited, whereafter respondent No.3 vide No.CE/PMGSY/J&K/S/1499-1503 dated 30th May 2009, asked petitioner to proceed with the work in accordance

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top