SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 605

Virender Singh, MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
State – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Verma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gagan Basotra, L.K. Sharma, Raghu Mehta.

Per Virender Singh, J.

1. The respondents/writ petitioners earned a judgment in their favour on 14.11.2007 passed in SWP No. 1528/2001 to the effect that their case shall be accorded consideration in the light of the judgment dated 14.10.2004 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in SWP No. 2191/2002 connected with LPA Nos.73/2003 & 210/2003 entitled `Ashok Kumar Raina v. State of J&K and others'. The consideration was to be accorded within a stipulated period of two months. When for a considerable long period the needful was not done, the respondents/writ petitioners were constrained to file contempt petition [Contempt(SWP) No. 112/2009], in which, after issuance of notice, statement of facts (compliance report) was filed. The learned Single Judge did not find the compliance report in consonance with the directions issued by the learned Writ Court and vide order dated 20.05.2010 directed the contemnors to file better affidavit/ compliance report indicating the steps taken by them in implementing the judgment by showing names of the respondents/writ petitioners in the seniority list of Junior Engineer (Civil), as also in all subsequent seniority lists, over and above the persons



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top