SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 256

M.M.Kumar, TASHI RABSTAN
Anil Kumar Prabhakar – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Shukla, Pranav Kohli.

Tashi Rabstan, J.

1. Through the medium of this Letters Patent Appeal, writ petitioner-appellant has assailed the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 15.05.2014 passed in SWP No. 662/2014, titled as Anil Kumar Prabhakar v. State of J&K and others, whereby writ petition of the writ petitioner-appellant has been dismissed having been found without merit.

2. The brief resume of the case is that the writ petitioner-appellant and Respondent No.4 on their promotion as Incharge Assistant Engineers (Civil) were adjusted in PHE Division Udhampur (Sub-Division, Ramnagar and PHE Sub- Division Doda West) by respondent No.2 vide Order No. PHEJ/GE/33/E of 2014 dated 04.03.2014. On the same date, Respondent No.2 issued a corrigendum vide Order No. PHEJ/GE/35/E of 2014 dated 04.03.2014 whereby place of posting of Respondent No.4 was changed from PHE Division Doda (Sub-Division Doda West) to PHE Division Udhampur (Sub-Division Ramnagar) where the writ petitioner-appellant had been posted earlier. So far as the writ petitioner-appellant is concerned, he was posted in PHE Direction Office, Jammu.

3. It was this corrigendum, writ petitioner-appellant had challenged before the learned Single Judge










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top