SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 279

Hasnain Massodi
D. K. Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Sethi, Veenu Gupta, R.S. Jamwal.

1. Petitioners are aggrieved with common order/findings and sentence dated 12th May 2006 recorded by General Court Martial whereby petitioners have been awarded punishment to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and dismissal from service. They, through medium of writ petitions on hand, throw challenge to Court Martial process and sentence on the grounds urged in respective petitions.

2. Learned counsel for respondents insists that writ petition on hand in wake of enactment of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, is required to be transferred to Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, for its disposal in accordance with law. It is stated that petition could not be earlier so transferred as Tribunal constituted vide Notification SRO 9(E) dated 7th August 2009 did not have a Bench to deal with the cases arising within territorial limits of Jammu and Kashmir State, and that Bench at Chandigarh having been constituted vide Notification SRO 17(E) dated 10th November 2009 at Chandigarh with jurisdiction, amongst other States, to the territorial limits of Jammu and Kashmir State, there is no impediment in its transfer, so that purpose of the Act is served and parties allowed its benef





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top