SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 79

JANAK RAJ KOTWAL
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Asha Koul, K.K. Pangotra, Rajneesh Raina.

1. Additional DIGP, GC, CRPF, Bantalab, Jammu, herein respondent no.3, issued letter no. RII.1/2005-EC-5 whereby offer of appointment for the post of Constable (GD) in CRPF was made to the petitioner. In this letter it was mentioned inter alia that the appointment is purely temporary and subject to verification of petitioner's educational and caste certificates. It was further mentioned in that letter that on appointment, the petitioner will be governed by CRPF Act, 1949 and Rules of 1955 and other Central Government Rules/Instructions as applicable to the members of the force issued from time to time. It was mentioned also that the petitioner will not leave camp under any circumstances without proper permission of the competent authority and further that no leave of any kind will be granted to the petitioner till completion of basic training. It was also mentioned that if petitioner is found unfit for recruit's basic training and do not complete it successfully his services were liable to be terminated.

2. Pursuant to and in furtherance of the offer letter, the petitioner was enrolled as Constable (GD) in CRPF (for short, the Force) on 05.12.2005 under Force No.050020128 and sent t

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top