HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J.
ASCON Contractors Pvt. Ltd. -Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. -Resopndent
A.A No. 19-2010
Decided On : 30-12-2013
Arbitration Clause - Construction Contract - The court referred the disputes between the contractor and the department to an independent arbitrator in accordance with the arbitration clause contained in the construction contract.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner completed the work to the satisfaction of the department but faced issues with possession and final bill payment. The petitioner sought reference of the disputes to the arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in the contract.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that disputes had arisen between the parties and the respondents failed to refer the disputes in terms of the arbitration clause within the prescribed time, leading to the appointment of an independent arbitrator.
Issues: Disputes over possession, final bill payment, and withholding of amount led to the petitioner seeking reference of disputes to the arbitrator.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to refer the disputes to an independent arbitrator in accordance with the arbitration clause as the respondents failed to refer the disputes within the prescribed time.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the case by appointing an independent arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties within the prescribed statutory period.
2. The petitioner states that the entire work was completed to the satisfaction of the department, which however, did not take over the possession of the executed work. It is stated that even when the work stood completed in 2007 final bill was not prepared till August, 2009. Finally, it is stated that an amount of Rs.19 lac approximately was deducted from the final bill illegally. It is against this withholding of the amount along with other issues, which gave cause of action to the petitioner to seek reference of the disputes to the arbitrator in terms of the arbitration clause. This was done by virtue of a registered letter dated 7-4-2010, invoking clause 27 of the tender document for the resolution of the disputes between the parties.
3. Clause 27.1 containing the arbitration clause is reproduced hereunder:
"All disputes between the contractor and the Department the Relief Commissioner (Mig.) shall act as an arbitrator whose decision shall be final and binding upon both the parties, provision of the J&K arbitration act with latest amendments thereof shall be applicable."
4. The petitioner has placed on record the receipt issued by the Indian Postal authorities regarding the service of the registered A/D containing the notice, seeking reference of disputes to the arbitrator.
5. Respondents have denied their liability to make any payment to the petitioner and have stated that they are ready to appoint the named arbitrator in the agreement, which right they never forfeited.
6. Looking to the fact that disputes have arisen between the parties and in view of the fact that the respondents failed to refer the disputes in terms of the arbitration clause within the time prescribed, it is deemed proper to refer the disputes to an independent arbitrator.
7. Accordingly, Sh. A.S. Wazir, Chief Engineer (retd.) is appointed as an arbitrator, who shall enter upon the reference and adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties within the prescribed statutory period. The parties shall be at liberty to file detailed claims and counter claims before the learned arbitrator. The arbitrator shall render his award within the prescribed statutory period. The fee of the arbitrator is fixed @ Rs. 15,000/~ per sitting, to be shared equally by the parties. Registrar Judicial shall intimate the learned arbitrator accordingly.
8. Disposed of accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.