SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(J&K) 401

Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Mohd. Bin Qasim – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A. Qayoom, Shahnaz Ratanpuri, N.H. Shah.

1. The case of the petitioner is that he had applied for grant of passport in order to pursue his studies outside the Country. It is contended that respondent No. 2 failed to issue the passport in favour of the petitioner, which compelled him to seek indulgence of this Court. Accordingly, the petitioner filed a writ petition, bearing OWP No. 413/2011. However, it is contended that during the pendency of the writ petition aforementioned, respondent No. 2 issued a passport under No. K1879755 in favour of the petitioner, for a short period of one year commencing 04th October, 2011 to 3rd October, 2012.

2. The writ petition (OWP No. 413/2011), accordingly, came to be disposed of by the Court, observing as under:

"Mr. Zargar learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 & 2 states that passport has been sent to the petitioner on 13th of October, 2011, It being so, nothing survives for consideration.

Petition accordingly disposed of alongwith connected CMP."

3. It is further submitted that, after obtaining the passport from respondent No. 2, petitioner got admission in International Islamic University, Malaysia for undergoing a programme of Bachelor of Information Technology. It is averred
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top