TASHI RABSTAN
Rajinder Singh Jamwal – Appellant
Versus
Kiran – Respondent
2. As per the averments made in the petition, it appears that petitioner has filed petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Court of learned Additional District Judge, (Matrimonial Cases), Jammu. Thereafter he filed application for amendment of the divorce petition, which came to be allowed vide order dated 14.08.2012 permitting the petitioner to file amended petition. It is also contended that petitioner appeared before the trial Court for his cross-examination by the counsel for the respondent, but instead of proceeding further with the cross-examination, trial Court vide order dated 20.01.2014 has fixed the case for filing of objections to the amended petition causing serious injustice and prejudice to the petitioner thereby
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.