SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 348

TASHI RABSTAN
Rajinder Singh Jamwal – Appellant
Versus
Kiran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aruna Thakur, R.K. Kotwal.

1. Petitioner through the medium of instant petition under Section 104 of the Constitution of the Jammu and Kashmir has invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court for setting aside order dated 20.01.2014 in case titled as Rajinder Singh Jamwal v. Smt. Kiran (hereinafter for short as `impugned order') by virtue of which learned trial Court has directed filing of objections to the amended petition on the grounds taken in the memo of petition.

2. As per the averments made in the petition, it appears that petitioner has filed petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Court of learned Additional District Judge, (Matrimonial Cases), Jammu. Thereafter he filed application for amendment of the divorce petition, which came to be allowed vide order dated 14.08.2012 permitting the petitioner to file amended petition. It is also contended that petitioner appeared before the trial Court for his cross-examination by the counsel for the respondent, but instead of proceeding further with the cross-examination, trial Court vide order dated 20.01.2014 has fixed the case for filing of objections to the amended petition causing serious injustice and prejudice to the petitioner thereby









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top