SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 217

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, Hasnain Massodi
Khati (Mst. ) – Appellant
Versus
Ali Mohd. Sofi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A. Khan, M.A. Qayoom.

Per Yaqoob, J.

1. In terms of judgment dated 13.02.2014, rendered in OWP No. 386/98, the order dated 14.05.2007, passed by Financial Commissioner in revision No. 62 of 1993 and the order dated 23rd June, 1998, passed in review No. 28/1997, have been set aside. Dissatisfied therewith, instant appeal has been preferred, wherein it is projected that the revision petition, as was filed before the Financial Commissioner, was hopelessly barred by limitation, no reason has been recorded for condoning the huge delay. The basic order recorded on mutation dated 21.01.1962 is based on compromise of the parties.

2. On the death of Ramzan Sofi, mutation of succession regarding estate left behind by him was to be attested. The proceedings initiated for attestation of mutation of succession were placed before the Naib Tehsildar concerned. Vis-a-vis landed property left behind by Ramzan Sofi in village Arwa Tehsil Beerwa District Budgam, mutation No. 370 has been attested on 21st January, 1962. The order has been recorded on the said mutation to the effect that the matter may be presented for attestation at Village Arwa on 21st January, 1962. On 21st January, 1962, on spot proceedings were initiated













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top