SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(J&K) 711

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Hanef – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Navneet Dubey, Ajay Sharma.

1. Admittedly, petitioner has been enrolled as Safai Karamchari in Station Headquarter Nagrota of 16 Corps C/o 56 APO on 10.11.1982. When his juniors were regularized, he filed SWP No. 1793/2001 seeking regularization of his services on completion of five years of his enrolment particularly, from the date his juniors have been declared permanent. Said writ petition has been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 13.05.2008. In the reply filed by the respondents in the above referred two writ petitions, SWP No. 1793/2001 has been stated to be pending which is not correct.

2. Petitioner has filed one more writ petition, SWP No. 755/2005 with the same prayer as made in the disposed of writ petition, SWP No. 1793/2001. It is during the pendency of the said writ petition, order impugned dated 22.12.2007 has been passed, in terms whereof, his services have been terminated. As against the said termination order, petitioner has filed another writ petition, i.e., SWP No. 2266/2007, seeking quashment of the order of termination and reinstatement as Safai Karachari with effect from 22.12.2007 with all consequential relief as well as damages.

3. It is projected that the order of termination has



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top