SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 382

M.M.Kumar, TASHI RABSTAN
Sansar Chand – Appellant
Versus
Som Dutt – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.P. Thakur, Vijay Gupta.

M.M. Kumar, CJ.

1. This letters patent appeal under Clause 12 of the Letters patent is directed against the order dated 04.07.2014 rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court upholding the order dated 11.05.2013 passed by learned 1st Additional District Judge, Jammu. The aforesaid order was challenged by invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 103 and 104 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir. It is further appropriate to notice that the learned Additional District Judge was hearing an appeal against interim order dated 31.12.2010 passed by Munsiff, Akhnoor in a suit for declaration-cum-permanent prohibitory injunction. In accordance with the interim order the parties were asked to maintain status quo, which was set aside by the learned 1st Additional District Judge. That order has been further upheld by the learned Single Judge.

2. Mr. Vijay Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset has raised a preliminary objection by submitting that the appeal under Clause XII of the Letters Patent is not maintainable as it emerges from an order of a Single Judge passed under supervisory jurisdiction. He further submit





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top