SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 298

TASHI RABSTAN
Aryan Aviation Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Sethi, Sudershan Sharma, H.A. Siddiqui, R.K. Gupta, Rahul Pant.

1. The challenge in this petition is to Communication No.DCK/Adm/14/ 704-05 dated 01.07.2014 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Kishtwar and Communication No.402/GS. Machail Yatra/14/470 dated 03.07.2014 issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Jammu vide Communication dated 03.07.2014 the Divisional Commissioner authorized the Deputy Commissioner, Kishtwar to open the financial bid of M/s. U-Tair India Pvt. Ltd., respondent No.4 herein, and allot the contract after finalization of the rates.

2. When this case was taken up on 31.07.2014, Mr. Sethi, learned senior counsel submitted at the Bar that looking to the nature of controversy and commencement of the contract with effect from 01.08.2014 this case may be heard finally, which was not opposed by learned counsel appearing for respondents. Therefore, with the consensus of learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition was admitted to hearing and taken up for final disposal.

3. The facts as borne out from the writ record and as pleaded by the writ petitioner are that the Deputy Commissioner, Kishtwar, respondent No.3 herein, issued Notice Inviting Tenders on 31.05.2014 inviting tenders for providing Helicopter service for Mac

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top