ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY
Gh. Hassan Lone – Appellant
Versus
Chief Election Commission – Respondent
Ali Mohd. Magrey, J.:-
1. The petitioner's nomination form to the 08-Sopore Assembly Constituency has been rejected by the Returning Officer and he has approached hill Court through ibis writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir (for short the State Constitution) seeking a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to accept and entertain his nomination paper. Upon notice, respondents have filed their reply wherein, besides contesting the petition on merits, they have raised preliminary objection to the maintainability of the writ petition.
2. Since the very maintainability of the writ petition is in question, therefore, I think it would be unnecessary to narrate the facts averred in the writ petition or the replies thereto filed by the respondents as they are irrelevant to the question of law that falls for determination.
3. Scrutiny of nomination papers and rejection or acceptance thereof falls within the connotation of the term 'election'. The question whether an election can be challenged in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the State
Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar
Mohamad Anwar Khan v. State of J&K & Ors. 2015 (2) JKJ 36 [HC] [Para 3]
Mohd Sultan Pandithpori v. Election Commission of India
Mohinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi
N.P. Ponuswami v. The Returning Officer AIR 1952 SC 64 [Para 6]
Pradyut Bordoloi v. Swapan Roy
S.T.O., Circle-I, Jabalpur v. Gh. Hassan Lone v. Chief Election Commission & Ors. Hanuman Prasad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.