SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(J&K) 172

TASHI RABSTAN
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K and another – Respondent


Advocates:
For the petitioner(s):Mr. S.K. Shukla, Advocate
For the respondent(s):Mr. Rakesh Khajuria, AAG.

ORDER

1. Through the medium of this Bail Application under Section 498 Cr.P.C., applicant-accused is seeking bail in case FIR No. 22/1025 registered against him in Police Station, Kanachak, Jammu for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 366 RPC which upon investigation was challaned in the Court of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu (Fast Track Court) for the commission of offence punishable under Section 376 RPC.

2. It is contended by learned counsel, Mr. Shukla that applicant-accused had moved the Court of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu (hereinafter referred to as Trial Court') on 30.03.2015, seeking bail immediately on the completion of sixty days of the investigation from the date of registration of the case on the ground that Police had failed to complete the investigation and produce the challan within sixty days, as the applicant-accused as a matter of right was entitled to bail. Alternatively, applicant-accused had also claimed bail on merits. During the pendency of the application, a challan also came to be presented.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused when was confronted with the amendment in the Cr.P.C., prescribing limit of






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top