Magrey, J.

The grievance of the petitioners in this petition is projected against the respondents in as much as they sought to implement the provisions of SRO 202 dated 30.06.2016 vis-a-vis the petitioners - the employees of the High Court appointed recently. Obviously, there seems to be some serious lack of understanding on the part of officers of Accounts Section of Registry of the High Court and their obliviousness of the relevant constitutional provision viz. Section 108 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir and the Rules framed by the High Court thereunder governing the recruitment to, and conditions of, service of the servants of the High Court. The petitioners in consequence have, and we must, at the very outset, say, unnecessarily challenged the said SRO 202 dated 30.06.2016.

2. Pursuant to advertisement no.417 dated 13.10.2015 issued by respondents 2 and 3, notifying certain vacancies of different nomenclature available in the High Court, the petitioners were selected and appointed as Restorers in terms of High Court order no.483 dated 04.07.2016. While fixing their pay, the Registrar General and/or the concerned Officers of the Registry of the High Court appear