IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, J.
Parvez Ahmad Shah – Appellant
Vs.
State of J&K & Ors. – Respondents
SWP No.1508 OF 2015
Decided On : 07-09-2017
Regulation 226(2) - Premature Retirement - Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations - [Regulation 226(2)] - The court discussed the impugned government order invoking Regulation 226(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations for the petitioner's premature retirement. The court highlighted the importance of considering the entire service record, including Annual Performance Reports (APRs), before recommending premature retirement. It emphasized that premature retirement should not be arbitrary, baseless, or tainted with malice, and should be based on a strong foundation. The court referred to legal principles established in the case of 'Baikuntha Nath Das and another Vs. Chief District Medical Officer, Baripada and another' and 'S. Ramachandra Raju Vs. State of Orissa' to emphasize the need for proper exercise of power and judicial review in cases of premature retirement.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Junior Engineer, was prematurely retired from service based on a government order invoking Regulation 226(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations. The petitioner challenged the order, citing his long and dedicated service, positive performance appraisals, and allegations of arbitrary retirement based on criminal cases.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Screening Committee recommending premature retirement had ignored the petitioner's positive performance appraisals and formed an opinion without proper consideration of the entire service record. The court also noted that premature retirement based solely on unproven criminal cases was inconsistent with the norms for premature retirement.
Issues: The issues included the arbitrary nature of the premature retirement order, the failure to consider the petitioner's positive performance appraisals, and the inconsistency of retiring the petitioner based solely on unproven criminal cases.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for proper consideration of the entire service record, including Annual Performance Reports, before recommending premature retirement. It also highlighted the inconsistency of retiring an individual based solely on unproven criminal cases.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the impugned government order for premature retirement was set aside. The petitioner was directed to be reinstated and paid all consequential service benefits.
1. Vide Government order impugned bearing No.906-GAD of 2015 dated 30.06.2015, in exercise of powers conferred by Regulation 226(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations (hereinafter referred to as CSR), petitioner has been retired from service with effect from forenoon of 01.07.2015. The order impugned reads as under:
Government of Jammu and Kashmir
General Administration Department
Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar
Government Order No.906-GAD of 2015
Dated : 30-06-2015
Whereas the Government is of opinion that it is in public interest to do so.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 226(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations, the Government hereby gives notice to Shri Parvez Ahmad Shah, Junior Engineer, PHE Division, Bandipora, that he having already rendered 22 years of service, shall retire from service w.e.f forenoon of 01/07//2015.
He is allowed three months of pay and allowances in lieu of three months notice.
By order of the Government of Jammu and Kashmir.
Sd/-
Commissioner/Secretary to the Government
2. Aggrieved thereof, instant petition has been filed wherein it is alleged that the petitioner was initially appointed as Sectional Officer vide Government order No.DC/PD/166 of 1984 dated 19.10.1984. For a long period of 31 years, he has served in various capacities and on the date impugned order was issued, he was working as Junior Engineer. It is also pleaded that he has all along served with utmost dedication, honesty and sincerity. He has been awarded certificate of merit on republic day 2013 as well as on the republic date, 2014 by District Development Commissioner, Bandipora and has been given a consolation prize on republic day 2015. In addition thereto, in the Annual Confidential Reports his performance has been appreciated and classified as “excellent” with the following break-up:
APRs for the Year
Rating
2009-2010
Excellent/good
2010-2011
Excellent/good
2011-2012
Excellent
2012-2013
Excellent
2013-2014
Excellent
2014-2015
Excellent/good
3. Petitioner has been given first and second grade promotion (in-situ) and then third grade promotion vide Chief Engineer PHE’s order No.51-PHE/Estt of 2014 dated 28.06.2014 but vide Government order dated 30.06.2015 impugned he has been given notice for compulsory retirement. The grounds projected for quashing the impugned order, precisely, as projected are:
(I) Impugned order is without any basis, therefore, is arbitrary and based on mala fides;
(II) Regulation 226(2) of the CSR has been observed in breach because service record of the petitioner has not been considered which was imperative;
(III) The tune and tenor of the impugned order is colourable. To fathom out true purport and colour of the impugned order, the veil has to be lifted;
(IV) Registration of two criminal cases against the petitioner, until same end in conviction, could be made base for premature retirement.
4. The reply filed by respondent No.1 reveal that the government for providing clean and effective administration to the public is bound to have periodic review of all its officers with the object of encouraging honest and efficient government servants and simultaneously weed out inefficient and corrupt officers/officials in the public interest, therefore, recourse to Regulation 226(2) and (3) of CSR is a step in right direction. It is further pleaded that for effective implementation of Regulation 226(2) of CSR, vide Government order No.17-GAD (Vig) 2015 dated 20.05.2015, Committee of following officers was constituted;
1.
Chief Secretary
Chairman,
2.
Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister
Member
3.
Principal Secretary to the Government Home Department
Member
4.
Commissioner/Secretary to the Government General Administration Department
Member-Secretary
5.
Secretary to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.